Skip to main content
· 2/15/1850

Succession of Rivet

Citations

  • 5 La. 142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to dismiss express warranty claim where “plaintiffs have alleged that the defendant failed or refused to repair” an allegedly defective part
  • declining to dismiss express warranty claim where “plaintiffs have alleged that the defendant failed or refused to repair” an allegedly defective part
  • “The plaintiffs also point to a combined total of 686 reports of rollaway incidents, . . . where the vast majority of those reports . . . were received by the defendant[.]”
  • “It is well recognized, both as a matter of law and common sense, that a merchantable vehicle under the statute requires more than the mere capability of just getting from point A to point B.”
  • \The defendant contends that the demand letter which was sent was inadequate because it did not describe the claims in sufficient detail. But the Court is obligated at this stage of the pleadings to accept the summary allegation that notice sufficient to satisfy the statute was sent.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Slidell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.