Skip to main content
· 11/15/1901

Succession of Moise

Citations

  • 107 La. 717

Syllabus

<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. The administratrix had authority to employ an attorney to defend a suit brought against the succession she represented The amount of the fee is fixed and the privilege for its collection is recognized.</p> <p>2. All the parties admitted that the fee of the notary contested was due in such a manner as to lead to the unavoidable conclusion that it was admitted as carried on the account of the administratfix.</p> <p>3. “Provisions” to be secured by a privilege must consist of supplies made to the debtor or his family by retail dealers of provisions during the last six months.</p> <p>4. A receipt showing payment in full of a judgment against a succession and subrogating the one by whom it was paid creates a prima facie presumption of a right which was not rebutted.</p> <p>5. A claim for the reimbursement of amounts which were entirely in the nature of a personal obligation of the debtor is only subject to the prescription of ten years.</p> <p>6. Pacts and corroborating circumstances with the testimony of one witness sustain the claim of one of the creditors of the succession.</p> <p>7. An account, after the legal delays, may be homologated so far as not opposed, and the amounts claimed limited to the oppositions filed. Cross on Succes sions, p. 480.</p> <p>8. The administratrix having acknowledged the claim of a creditor carried on her account, to the correctness of which she swore, and other corroborating cir cumstances and the evidence of one witness, were sufficient to sustain a claim for more than $500.00.</p> <p>9. An annuity was originally rightly credited and the judgment is amended only to the extent necessary to reinstate the claim, as that is all that is claimed under the pleadings.</p> <p>10. Books of amounts received may be taken as proof against him who has written them.</p> <p>11. The administratrix, in settling with one of the creditors, under the circumstances of this case, may invoke compensation against his claim, in case it appe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[M]ere status as an alcoholic or substance abuser does not necessarily imply the requisite limitation for a disability determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breaux

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.