Succession of Lenel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding plaintiffs’ “conclusory allegations and ‘anecdotal’ testimony” were insufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact as to deception
• finding that “[u]njust enrichment claims should be dismissed where the violative conduct alleged is conterminous with a conventional tort or contract claim, regardless of whether the tort or contract claim is dismissed.”
• granting summary judgment to defendants where, inter alia, “[p]laintiffs offer nothing more than their own conclusory allegations and ‘anecdotal’ testimony to show what implied claims Ester-C purportedly conveyed.”
• “To satisfy the reasonable consumer standard [under the UCL and FAL], a plaintiff must adduce extrinsic evidence . . . to show how reasonable consumers interpret the challenged claims.”
• “To satisfy the reasonable consumer standard [under the FAL and UCL], a plaintiff must adduce extrinsic evidence—ordinarily in the form of a survey—to show how reasonable consumers interpret the challenged claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).