Skip to main content
· 3/15/1850

Succession of Langley

Citations

  • 5 La. 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing contract claim because plaintiff failed to provide “fundamental facts,” including the “specific contract terms” allegedly breached
  • “[I]f Plaintiffs’ proposed Amended Complaint would fail to state a claim under the Twombly/Iqbal pleading standard, those proposed amendments would be ‘futile.’”
  • “[A]ny action under 12 U.S.C. § 1833a 14 must be brought by the government.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.