· 3/15/1850
Succession of Langley
Citations
- 5 La. 199
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing contract claim because plaintiff failed to provide “fundamental facts,” including the “specific contract terms” allegedly breached
- “[I]f Plaintiffs’ proposed Amended Complaint would fail to state a claim under the Twombly/Iqbal pleading standard, those proposed amendments would be ‘futile.’”
- “[A]ny action under 12 U.S.C. § 1833a 14 must be brought by the government.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rost
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.