Succession of Lanasa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that they must search the record as a whole to determine whether evidence supports the zoning board's decision to grant a variance when the board did not state a collective, official reason for its actions
• board’s discussion of reasons supporting variance before vote and chairman’s remarks in moving to grant variance did not constitute collective statement of basis for board’s decision granting variance
• ‘‘although individual members of the board discussed reasons for granting the owners a variance, the board did not state a collective, official reason for its action’’
• ‘‘although individual members of the board discussed reasons for granting the owners a variance, the board did not state a collective, official reason for its action’’
• board’s discussion of reasons supporting variance before vote and chairman’s remarks in moving to grant variance did not constitute collective statement of basis for board’s decision grant- ing variance
• ‘‘[a] fundamental premise of due process is that a court cannot adjudicate any matter unless the parties have been given a reason- able opportunity to be heard on the issues involved’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).