Skip to main content
· 3/28/1904

Succession of Glancey

Citations

  • 112 La. 430
  • 36 So. 483
  • 1904 La. LEXIS 412

Syllabus

<p>PARTITION BY LICITATION — COMMUNITY— RIOHTS OF SURVIVOR — USUFRUCT.</p> <p>1. Partition by licitation would put at naught the statute Act No. 152, p. 99, of 1844, enacted for the protection of the survivor of the community.</p> <p>2. The evident intention was to enable the survivor to retain his property, together with the property over which it is enacted, that he or she shall hold the usufruct.</p> <p>3. The property is divisible in kind. The right may be sold. It cannot, however, be partitioned by licitation, without defeating the purpose of the enactment granting the usufruct.</p> <p>4. The will did not dispose of property adversely to the survivor. The legatee has renounced the benefit of the legacy to the extent that it might interfere with the usufruct.</p> <p>5. The amount sought to be recovered for asserted revenues is not shown to be due.</p> <p>Provosty, J., dissenting.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an NTA without a date and time cannot vest an immigration court with jurisdiction
  • holding that an NTA without a date and time cannot vest an immigration court with jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breaux

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.