Succession of Fried
Citations
- 106 La. 276
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. Although an under-tutor is appointed a few days prior to the appointment of a tutor, his appointment is legal.</p> <p>2. The debtor to the minors should not be appointed one of the members of a family meeting called to recommend some one to be appointed tutor. This rule of exclusion does not have the effect of excluding the brother of the minors, who is without interest, and who is not a debtor to them.</p> <p>3. There were relatives of the minors to compose the family meeting. They were not called, but friends were appointed. Friends are called upon to serve in default of relatives. C. C. 281.</p> <p>4. The judgment homologating the proceedings of the family meeting is annulled, and the case is remanded.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expert 26 testimony should be excluded “[w]here the jury is in as good a position as the expert to draw 27 conclusions from the evidence, and is capable of drawing its own inferences . . . ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breaux
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.