Succession of Feray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a bystander bitten by a police dog in the course of a search had been seized under the Fourth Amendment
• stating that an “implicit holding in Szabla” is “that a seizure occurs when a [K9] seizes an individual [whom] police did not know to be present, at least when police initially believe that the individual is the suspect” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).