Skip to main content
· 6/24/1992

Succession of Crowe v. Henry

Citations

  • 602 So. 2d 243
  • 1992 WL 143521

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A transaction between an attorney and a client is closely scrutinized and may be annulled even though the same transaction with a non-client without overreaching may be found unobjectionable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marvin, Sexton and Victory

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.