Suburban Transfer Service, Inc. v. Beech Holdings, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that exhaustion not required under protest procedures where prospective importers challenge Customs regulations imposing import restrictions
• finding that imposition of quotas by President under Agriculture Act of 1956, did not violate due process as no statute or international agreement conferred importers with basis for entitlement or proprietary interest
• finding section 204 “a law providing for quantitative restrictions” within language of § 1581(i)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).