Subsalve USA Corp. v. Watson Manufacturing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[ojrdi-narily, an appellate court confronted with an internally inconsistent order would vacate the offending order and return the case to the authoring court for clarification”
• finding an internally inconsistent order that purported both to dismiss and to transfer a case immediately appealable for the purpose of resolving the inconsistency
• “[E]very court of appeals to have confronted [the is- sue] has concluded that section 1631 transfer orders are not immediately appealable.” (collecting cases)
• “Ordinarily, an appellate court confronted with an internally inconsistent order would vacate the offending order and return the case to the authoring court for clarification.”
• “Ordinarily, an appellate court confronted with an internally inconsistent order would vacate the offending order and return the case to the authoring court for clarification.”
• “An appellate tribunal, however, should not mechanically resort to this remedy [of remand] when doing so would accomplish nothing more than the undue prolongation of the litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).