Submersible Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. Perforadora Central, S.A. De C v. Defendant/appellant/cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that having a construction project in forum state and maintaining an office with three employees in forum state did not satisfy standard for general jurisdiction
• having a construction project and maintaining an office with three employees in forum state did not satisfy standard for general jurisdiction
• describing Browne's early employment with BP, in which he worked in several U.S. cities between the years of 1969 and 1983
• finding defendant’s contract with forum state company and maintenance of an officer in the forum state are not sufficiently continuous and systematic contacts to give rise to general personal jurisdiction
• “[T]he continuous and systematic contacts test is a difficult one to meet, requiring extensive contacts between the defendant and a forum.”
• “The due process required in federal cases governed by Rule 41 No. 20-30382 c/w No. 20-30379 4(k)(2) is measured with reference to the Fifth Amendment, rather than the Fourteenth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).