Skip to main content
· 3/5/1927

Subirana v. Kramer

Citations

  • 17 F.2d 725
  • 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that once the district court dismissed plaintiffs infringement claims for lack of standing it was correct for the district court to also dismiss defendant’s counterclaims and motions relating to non-infringement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Bingham, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.