Subic Bay v. JV China

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• treating the prohibited means listed in § 1589(a) as a single element of a forced labor offense
• “[A] district court is not required to adopt additional proposed language—even if it accurately states the law—and does not abuse its discretion in declining to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).