Subh v. Central Intelligence Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding CIA’s “Glomar” response appropriate in context of person-specific FOIA request for records concerning any intelligence checks on that individual
• finding same as to the treatment of Privacy Act Exemption (j)(1) and FOIA Exemption 3
• “It is well established that these provisions of the NSA Act and the CIA Act are precisely the type of statutes 7 comprehended by [E]xemption 3.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).