Skip to main content
· 1/15/1894

Suberville v. Adams

Citations

  • 46 La. Ann. 119
  • 14 So. 518

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where participants discuss both innocent and criminal activity, agents may be justified in monitoring all conversations
  • “Identification of the contours of the conspiracy and the participants may be the government’s principal objective.”
  • government must adopt procedures to limit interception when wiretapping public phones used by persons not under investigation
  • “Where the criminal enterprise under investigation is a large-scale conspiracy with many participants, it may be necessary for the government to monitor more conversations with greater intensity than when the investigation is more limited”
  • witness identification of voice from wiretap recording

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waticins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.