· 1/15/1894
Suberville v. Adams
Citations
- 46 La. Ann. 119
- 14 So. 518
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where participants discuss both innocent and criminal activity, agents may be justified in monitoring all conversations
- “Identification of the contours of the conspiracy and the participants may be the government’s principal objective.”
- government must adopt procedures to limit interception when wiretapping public phones used by persons not under investigation
- “Where the criminal enterprise under investigation is a large-scale conspiracy with many participants, it may be necessary for the government to monitor more conversations with greater intensity than when the investigation is more limited”
- witness identification of voice from wiretap recording
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waticins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.