Subdivision Services Corp. v. Zoning Hearing Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “equivocal testimony can[not] be deemed substantial so as to justify the [factfinder’s] reliance thereon .... ”
• stating that “equivocal testimony can[not] be deemed substantial so as to justify the [factfinder’s] reliance thereon . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Borough of Emmaus v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-03-13· cited 7×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Zangrilli v. Zoning Hearing Board of Borough of Dormont
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-04-16· cited 7×
• Compton v. Zoning Hearing Board of Pennsbury Township
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-03-16· cited 4×