District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/5/2004
Suarez v. State
Citations
- 879 So. 2d 1251
- 2004 WL 957057
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that declarant's comment made prior to the relevant timeframe in which state of mind was at issue was not admissible under the state of mind exception to the hearsay rule
- holding that declarant’s comment made prior to the relevant timeframe in which state of mind was at issue was not admissible under the state of mind exception to the hearsay rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fletcher, Ramirez, and Shepherd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-03· cited 93×
- Van Zant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-06-15· cited 27×
- Webb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-07-30· cited 27×
- Usher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-12· cited 7×
- Century Surety Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-21· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.