Su Hwa She v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an applicant is not entitled to adjudication of an application for withholding of removal to a country that nobody is trying to send them to”
• holding agency erred where IJ failed to make any finding on disputed issue and BIA merely “surmised” that IJ had made such a finding
• upholding agency’s decision to pretermit petitioner’s Burma-based claims of relief because the designated country of removal was Taiwan, and Burma was only designated as an alternate country of removal
• “Due process and this court’s precedent require a minimum degree of clarity in dispositive reasoning and in the treatment of a properly raised argument.”
• “Due process and this court’s precedent require a 4 minimum degree of clarity in dispositive reasoning and in the treatment of a properly raised argument.”
• “Absent an adverse credibility finding, the BIA is required to ‘presume the petitioner’s testimony to be credible.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).