Ninth Circuit· 12/14/2010

Su Hwa She v. Holder

Citations

629 F.3d 958
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 25426
2010 WL 5141271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “an applicant is not entitled to adjudication of an application for withholding of removal to a country that nobody is trying to send them to”
holding agency erred where IJ failed to make any finding on disputed issue and BIA merely “surmised” that IJ had made such a finding
upholding agency’s decision to pretermit petitioner’s Burma-based claims of relief because the designated country of removal was Taiwan, and Burma was only designated as an alternate country of removal
“Due process and this court’s precedent require a minimum degree of clarity in dispositive reasoning and in the treatment of a properly raised argument.”
“Due process and this court’s precedent require a 4 minimum degree of clarity in dispositive reasoning and in the treatment of a properly raised argument.”
“Absent an adverse credibility finding, the BIA is required to ‘presume the petitioner’s testimony to be credible.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Smith, Hogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.