Styrene Information and Research Center, Inc. v. Sebelius

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that agency’s adoption of some reports but not others “lends some credibility” to suggestion that the rejected reports were “adverse”
• completing administrative record with draft technical reports where the “scientific information and advice” in the reports was “substantively considered” and factored into the final report
• completing record with expert panel subgroup draft reports because such reports were identified as integral to the expert panel’s report to the agency, upon which the agency relied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).