Styles v. Ceranski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “exploitation of the trial court’s error in allowing ... [three additional] witnesses to testify as both damages and liability experts reflected the intertwining of [liability and damages],” and “[t]he proper remedy is a new trial on all liability and damages issues”
• stating that this court must set aside a verdict “if there is no evidence in the record to justify it”
• “It is not only our right, but our duty, to set aside a verdict if there is no evidence in the record to justify it.” (citation modified)
• motion for a new trial
• motion for a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).