Style v. Shaub

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he trial court possesses wide discretion as -2- J-S75032-16 to the proper amount of child support and a reviewing court will not interfere with the determination of the court below unless there has been a clear abuse of discretion.” (citation omitted)
• stating “the test is whether the child is physically and mentally able to engage in profitable employment and whether employment is available to that child at a supporting wage”
• approximately one year after termination of a child support order pursuant to Rule 1910.19, the petitioner filed a new complaint for support based on the child’s medical and psychiatric limitations
• “In Pennsylvania, the duty to support a child generally ceases when the child reaches the age of majority, which is defined as either eighteen years of age or when the child graduates from high school, whichever comes later.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).