Styer v. Hugo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Johnson court’s gratuitous speculation as to whether appellant might be able to pursue such a theory at a later time is pure dicta.”
• “[T]he appellant [in Johnson ] had never sought recovery on a theory of unjust enrichment at any point in either the trial court or on appeal. The Johnson Court’s gratuitous speculation as to whether appellant might be able to pursue such a theory at a later time is pure dicta.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).