Skip to main content
· 12/7/1951

Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Driskill

Citations

  • 244 S.W.2d 291
  • 1951 Tex. App. LEXIS 1773

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if the automobile had been repaired and returned, the proper measure of damages would have been the difference between the value of the car before it was stolen, and the value after it was stolen, recovered, and repaired
  • stolen car was never repaired or returned to insured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Renfro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.