Skip to main content
· 7/6/1954

Stuyvesant Corp. v. Waterhouse

Citations

  • 74 So. 2d 554
  • 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a contract was implied where the special employer allowed the claimant to come onto its premises, use its equipment, and participate in its show under its direction.
  • contract of employment for purposes of borrowed servant doctrine may be implied from circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Drew

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.