Skip to main content
D. Maryland· 10/10/2018

Stutzman v. Krenik

Citations

  • 350 F. Supp. 3d 366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that because plaintiff had stated a claim for excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment, he had also stated claims for battery and gross negligence
  • holding that an arrest was justified—and that therefore the plaintiff failed to state a claim for false arrest under Maryland law—because the police officer had probable cause for believing that the plaintiff had committed a misdemeanor in the officer’s presence
  • holding in the context of gross negligence claims alleging excessive force that the principle of objective reasonableness articulated in Graham v. Connor controls
  • dismissing plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment § 1983 claim where plaintiff’s complaint itself established probable cause to conclude that the plaintiff committed the relevant offense
  • finding a claim for excessive force where the Plaintiff had a visible medical condition, requested to be handcuffed in front his body, and screamed in pain when handcuffed behind his back
  • “Maryland courts construe Article 26 in pari materia with the Fourth Amendment, such that its comparable provisions are essentially equated to the Fourth Amendment’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chuang

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.