Stutzke v. D.G.C. Liquidation Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A cause of action for tortious interference requires that there be direct, intentional interference.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gilman Yacht Sales v. First Nat. Bank
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-19· cited 4×
• Stutzke v. Kohl
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-03-06· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-10-04· cited 1,882×
• Wackenhut Corp. v. Maimone
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-09-24· cited 60×
• Burger Chef Systems, Inc. v. Burger Chef of Florida, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-07-18· cited 16×
• Rosa v. Florida Coast Bank
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-02-19· cited 10×