Stutz v. Shepard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expressing “clear preference for making every reasonable presumption in favor of the arbitration award and the arbitrator’s acts and proceedings”
• expressing “clear preference for making every reasonable presumption in favor of the arbitration award and the arbitrator’s acts and proceedings”
• ‘‘in light of the demanding ‘clearly erroneous’ standard . . . the reso- lution of each of the plaintiff’s claims requires an exami- nation of the entire record’’
• [I]t is incumbent upon the appellant to take the necessary steps to sustain its burden of providing an adequate record for appellate review. . . . [A]n appellate tribunal cannot render a decision without first fully understanding the disposition being appealed. ...
• parties “mutually, agreed upon” application of “clearly erroneous” review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).