Skip to main content
· 9/1/1995

Stutz Motor Car of America, Inc. v. Reebok International, Ltd.

Citations

  • 909 F. Supp. 1353
  • 38 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1253
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20455
  • 1995 WL 600013

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding in commercial context that actual knowledge of trade secret claims, coupled with the widespread advertisement and sale of the alleged infringing product, precluded the application of the discovery rule
  • holding in commercial context that actual knowledge of trade secret claims, coupled with the widespread advertisement and sale of the alleged infringing product, precluded the application of the discovery rule
  • imputing knowledge of widely publicized shoe sale campaign where defendants were involved in footwear industry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baird

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.