Sturman v. Socha

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that misleading nature of terms “has resulted in a blurring of the distinction typically drawn between them”
• recognizing that misleading nature of terms 'has resulted in a blurring of the distinction typically drawn between them'
• recognizing that misleading nature of terms ‘has resulted in a blurring of the distinction typically drawn between them’
• distinguishing between necessary and indispensable parties and noting that the former are not required for adjudication of an issue
• son who signed nursing care agreement as \Responsible Party\ for his father was \unambiguously\ personally liable for amounts owed to nursing home
• “[W]hen two or more meanings may fairly be given to language in a contract, the language is to be construed against the one who drew it_”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).