Sturkey v. McCall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “an FCA action is available on an implied certification theory even absent an express designation as a condition of payment, where the requirement plainly satisfies materiality”
• remanding case in light of an intervening Supreme Court opinion, including for consideration of whether to allow the plaintiffs to file a second amended complaint
• acknowledging the applicability of a fraudulent inducement theory where “the original fraud . . . influenced the Government’s decision to enter into a particular contract at a particular price”
• “Under Rule 9(b) allegations of fraud must include facts as to time, place, and substance of the defendant's alleged fraud.”
• “[S]ubsequent claims are false ‘because of an original fraud (whether a certification or otherwise).’”
• “At common law, fraud has long encompassed certain misrepresentations by omission.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).