Sturgis v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering that a proposed amendment be placed on the ballot but stating, “[w]e do not hold that an amendment to a charter must be submitted, even though it is manifestly unconstitutional”
• “A home rule charter and all amendments thereto must be in harmony with the Constitution and laws of this state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).