Skip to main content
· 11/11/1903

Sturgill v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.

Citations

  • 116 Ky. 659
  • 76 S.W. 826
  • 1903 Ky. LEXIS 238

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the tort of outrage applies “only in flagrantly egregious circumstances”
  • “[T]he tort of outrage is ‘a limited remedy to be applied only in flagrantly egregious circumstances.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.