· 11/11/1903
Sturgill v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.
Citations
- 116 Ky. 659
- 76 S.W. 826
- 1903 Ky. LEXIS 238
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the tort of outrage applies “only in flagrantly egregious circumstances”
- “[T]he tort of outrage is ‘a limited remedy to be applied only in flagrantly egregious circumstances.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.