Sturgeon's Administrator v. McCorkle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the redacted information was “derived from' reports generated pursuant to the Bank Secrecy Act”
• holding that a \case initiation form\ describing \various particulars regarding the Plaintiff's case\ created \in the course of an investigation that was undertaken with litigation in mind\ was entirely protected under Exemption 5 (citation omitted)
• holding that a “case initiation form” describing “various particulars regarding the Plaintiff’s case” created “in the course of an investigation that was undertaken with litigation in mind” was entirely protected under Exemption 5 (citation omitted)
• upholding Exemption 7(C) claims where plaintiff offered only speculation as to government misconduct
• “grand jury 4 testimony is precisely the type of information that [Exemption 3] is designed to protect”
• relying on Reporters Comm., 489 U.S. at 756

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).