Skip to main content

Sturgeon v. State

Citations

  • 683 N.E.2d 612
  • 1997 Ind. App. LEXIS 903
  • 1997 WL 395388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial has not been violated
  • holding that an eighteen-month delay was “presumptively prejudicial.”
  • arrestee “is aware he must face a charge of committing a crime on a particular date”
  • arrestee \is aware he must face a charge of committing a crime on a particular date\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Sullivan, Chezem

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.