Skip to main content
· 10/24/1988

Sturgeon v. Celotex Corp.

Citations

  • 762 P.2d 1156
  • 52 Wash. App. 609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • error is not prejudicial unless it affects or presumptively affects the outcome of the trial
  • error is not prejudicial unless it affects or presumptively affects the outcome of the trial
  • challenges brought “after LUPA’s 21-day time period for filing an appeal constitute impermissible collateral attacks”
  • party failed to preserve alleged error for appeal by failing to make adequate offer of proof as to what expert's testimony would have been if he had been allowed to testify
  • no objection to trial testimony is necessary to preserve right to have ruling denying motion in limine reviewed, so long as ruling was final and definitive, and thus one on which parties could rely
  • when a subject is opened up by a party on direct or cross-examination, the other party may cross-examine or examine on re-direct within the scope of the examination in which the subject matter was first introduced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scholfield, Grosse, Williams, Tern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.