Skip to main content
· 7/7/1988

Sturdivant v. Medical Engineering Corp.

Citations

  • 121 F.R.D. 51
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7048
  • 1988 WL 70080

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to find attorney-client privilege applicable to conversations between police officer and his union representative
  • rule that evidentiary privileges be “strictly construed” precludes distortion of common law definition of “lawyer” to include a union official representing police officer at disciplinary proceeding
  • “one could perhaps envision a satisfactory union representation relationship without total confidentiality”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smalkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.