Sturdevant v. Wisconsin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[e]vidence is not necessarily insufficient merely because the witness' testimony has been contradictory and the explanations therefor difficult of belief\ (citation omitted)
• “[e]vidence is not necessarily insufficient merely because the witness’ testimony has been contradictory and the explanations therefor difficult of belief” (citation omitted)
• “The mere possibility that an item of undisclosed information might have helped the defense, or might have affected the outcome of trial, does not establish ‘materiality’ in the constitutional sense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).