Stum's Admr. v. Stum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that: (1) § 1988(a)’s text plainly and unambiguously does not extend to Title IX actions; and (2) no evidence supports an inference that § 1988(a)’s limitations are due to legislative oversight in failing to update § 1988
• finding that “leave to amend should be freely given if it is possible that further factual allegations will cure any defect.”
• only 14 institutions, not individuals, may be liable under Title IX

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).