Stumph v. Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding res ipsa loquitur applicable thus raising an inference of negligence because a rational trier of fact could infer that a careful chiropractor would not have broken the plaintiffs rib while manipulating her spine
• expert testimony unnecessary to conclude a chiropractor negligently broke his patient’s rib during treatment for migraine headaches

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).