Stumpf v. Robinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding “whether a reinstated removal order is ‘administratively final’ during the pendency of withholding-only proceedings”
• finding that although an alien subject to a reinstated removal order is “clearly removable,” § 1226 applies pending the outcome of withholding-only proceedings because it governs detention for aliens whose removal proceedings are ongoing
• holding that § 1226(a) governs
• holding that § 1226 applies
• “Chevron deference is inapplicable because [Part 241] do[es] not answer the question of which provision governs Guerra’s detention.”
• \ Chevron deference is inapplicable because [Part 241] do[es] not answer the question of which provision governs Guerra's detention.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).