Stull v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 16 the court should consider the recommendation of counsel, and weigh it according to 17 counsel’s caliber and experience
• holding that the court 6 should consider the recommendation of counsel, and weight it according to counsel’s 7 caliber and experience
• holding that the court 19 should consider the recommendation of counsel, and weight it according to counsel’s 20 caliber and experience
• “[T]rial courts have found that, when the class plaintiff is so closely allied with the class attorney that he or she might have an interest in the legal fees that the attorney may ultimately seek, there is at least a potential conflict of interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).