Nebraska Supreme Court· 4/18/1941
Stuehm v. Mikulski
Citations
- 139 Neb. 374
- 297 N.W. 595
- 137 A.L.R. 327
- 1941 Neb. LEXIS 73
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The four unities heretofore listed must not only come into being with the creation of such an estate, but must also continue to exist while the estate exists, and the destruction of any one of them as to all holders will destroy the estate.... ”
- “The four unities heretofore listed must not only come into being with the creation of such an estate, but must also continue to exist while the estate exists, and the destruction of any one of them as to all holders will destroy the estate . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carter, Eberly, Messmore, Paine, Rose, Simmons, Tewell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Buford v. DahlkeNebraska Supreme Court· 1954-01-22· cited 75×
- Krause v. CrossleyNebraska Supreme Court· 1979-04-03· cited 35×
- Creek v. Union Nat. Bank in Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri· 1954-02-08· cited 28×
- Andrews v. HallNebraska Supreme Court· 1953-04-24· cited 23×
- Herring v. CarrollWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-02-16· cited 20×
- De Forge v. PatrickNebraska Supreme Court· 1956-05-04· cited 18×
- In Re the Estate of JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2007-09-28· cited 18×
- Anson v. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court· 1948-05-12· cited 17×
- In Re Ogier's EstateNebraska Supreme Court· 1963-11-22· cited 14×
- Cast v. NATIONAL BANK OF COM. T. & S. ASS'N OF LINCOLNNebraska Supreme Court· 1971-02-05· cited 13×
- Estate of Holland v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1975-06-30· cited 13×
- Majerus v. SantoNebraska Supreme Court· 1943-08-06· cited 13×
- Jones v. ShrigleyNebraska Supreme Court· 1948-08-06· cited 8×
- Baskins v. KrepcikNebraska Supreme Court· 1950-07-13· cited 7×
- Cleaver v. LongLicking County Court of Common Pleas· 1955-01-15· cited 4×
- Cast v. National Bank of Commerce Trust & Savings Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court· 1971-02-05· cited 3×
- United States v. 12,800 Acres of LandD. Nebraska· 1947-01-06· cited 3×
- Sterner v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court· 1982-01-08· cited 2×
- In The Matter Of The Estate Of Roy N. Johnson , William H. Johnson, Of The Estate Of Emogene F. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2007-09-28
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. JacobsSupreme Court· 1939-02-27· cited 185×
- Deslauriers v. SenesacIllinois Supreme Court· 1928-10-25· cited 40×
- Bassett v. BudlongMichigan Supreme Court· 1889-11-01· cited 37×
- Bennett v. HutchensTennessee Supreme Court· 1915-09-15· cited 31×
- Ames v. ChandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1929-01-02· cited 26×
- Fleming v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa· 1919-12-16· cited 25×
- Pegg v. PeggMichigan Supreme Court· 1911-03-31· cited 25×
- Benzon v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court· 1928-03-26· cited 24×
- Colson v. BakerNew York County Courts· 1904-01-15· cited 17×
- Saxon v. SaxonNew York Supreme Court· 1905-01-15· cited 13×
- Wright v. KnappMichigan Supreme Court· 1915-01-04· cited 13×
- Jorgensen v. CrandellNebraska Supreme Court· 1938-02-18· cited 13×
- Smith v. Douglas CountyEighth Circuit· 1918-10-28· cited 12×
- Neneman v. RickleyNebraska Supreme Court· 1923-06-27· cited 11×
- Boehringer v. SchmidNew York Court of Appeals· 1930-10-14· cited 9×
- Northwest Ready Roofing Co. v. AntesNebraska Supreme Court· 1928-06-01· cited 9×
- Brown v. JacksonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1931-11-12· cited 7×
- Michigan State Bank v. KernMichigan Supreme Court· 1915-12-22· cited 7×
- Coon v. CampbellNew York Supreme Court· 1930-03-24· cited 5×
- Smith v. HoggCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1922-04-21· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.