Studli v. Children & Youth & Families Central Regional Office

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying confirmation of the debtor's chapter 13 plan, even though the creditor failed to object, because the proposed plan attempted to modify the residential mortgage holder's rights, which violated the Code's anti-modification provision
• \A plan that attempts to do what § 1322(b)(2) forbids does not satisfy [the requirement under section 1325(a)(1) ] that the plan compl[y] with the provisions of [chapter 13] and with the other applicable provisions of [title 11].\
• \A plan that attempts to do what § 1322(b)(2) forbids does not satisfy [the requirement under section 1325(a)(1) ] that the plan compl[y] with the provisions of [chapter 13] and with the other applicable provisions of [title 11].\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).