Student A. Ex Rel. Mother of Student A. v. Metcho

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the plaintiff did not waive her right to remand by filing a jury demand, even though the plaintiff did not file a timely remand motion
• rejecting defendants’ contention that § 25 1013(a) was applicable because, “although state law determines when service is made, federal law defines the procedure for the federal removal statute,” and Rule 6 “governs computation of time 26 || for purposes of that statute”
• rejecting defendants’ contention that § 25 1013(a) was applicable because, “although state law determines when service is made, federal law defines the procedure for the federal removal statute,” and Rule 6 “governs computation of time 26 || for purposes of that statute”
• Under California Code of Civil Procedure 5 § 1013(a), service is complete “upon deposit of the amended 6 complaint in the mail . . . .”
• Under California Code of Civil Procedure 5 § 1013(a), service is complete “upon deposit of the amended 6 complaint in the mail . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).