Stucki v. Noble

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• counsel’s affidavits stating check copies were “true and correct” is not competent summary-judgment evidence absent a foundation for counsel’s personal knowledge
• counsel’s affidavits stating check copies were “true and correct” is not competent summary-judgment evidence absent a foundation for counsel’s personal knowledge
• affidavits describing affiant’s relationships with relevant facts can support reasonable assumptions about affiant’s personal knowledge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).