Missouri Court of Appeals· 8/28/2018
Stucker v. Stucker
Citations
- 558 S.W.3d 119
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “If [Father] wanted to dispute the validity of the Second Amended Judgment’s custody and child support determinations, he should not have stipulated to them.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dowd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sean Wigglesworth v. Marie WigglesworthMissouri Court of Appeals· 2019-04-30
- Wigglesworth v. WigglesworthMissouri Court of Appeals· 2019-04-30
- Sophia D. Chatman v. Thomas ChatmanMissouri Court of Appeals· 2023-08-15
- Pendragon Properties, LLC. v. Latanya HaywoodMissouri Court of Appeals· 2023-05-16
- Matthew J. Weiss, Respondent, vs. Mary D. Weiss, Appellant.Missouri Court of Appeals· 2025-07-15
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- 8182 Maryland Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. SheehanSupreme Court of Missouri· 2000-04-25· cited 33×
- State Ex Rel. Fletcher v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1968-07-16· cited 21×
- Hagen v. Rapid American Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-05-22· cited 12×
- Sleater v. SleaterMissouri Court of Appeals· 2001-02-27· cited 10×
- Cook v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals· 1994-11-07· cited 9×
- Segar v. SegarMissouri Court of Appeals· 2001-05-29· cited 9×
- Nations v. HoffMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-05-28· cited 9×
- Henze v. SchallertMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-12-17· cited 3×
Other cases named Stucker v. Stucker
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.