Stubbs v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court erred in refusing to allow defendant to challenge the inclusion of victim injury and legal constraint points at sentencing following revocation of probation
• holding that trial court erred in refusing to allow defendant to challenge the inclusion of victim injury and legal constraint points at sentencing following revocation of probation
• \[A] defendant may challenge the inclusion of [sentencing] points at a revocation proceeding even when those points were not challenged at the original sentencing or on direct appeal.\ (quoting Matton v. State, 872 So.2d 308, 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tasker v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2010-11-10· cited 13×
• Tasker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-24· cited 4×
• Bowman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-25· cited 3×
• Bryant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-30· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Montague
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-10-31· cited 33×
• Fitzhugh v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-22· cited 14×
• Wright v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-25· cited 7×
• Matton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-14· cited 6×
• Spell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-15· cited 6×
• Bogan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-15· cited 4×
• West v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-10· cited 2×