Skip to main content
· 10/26/1978

Stubbs v. Patterson Dental Laboratories

Citations

  • 573 S.W.2d 274
  • 1978 Tex. App. LEXIS 3836

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the inclusion of the words “with prejudice” does not make a stipulated dismissal a final determination on the merits, so long as the parties did not “enter[] into a compromise and settlement of the first case”
  • distinguishing cases in which the parties dismiss a case “pursuant to a settlement of the controversy” and ones in which they dismiss for other reasons and concluding that only the former type of dismissal counts as a judgment “on the merits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCLOUD

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.