Stubbs v. Harmon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]his Court will not substitute its judgment for that of the jury and will neither weigh evidence nor determine witness credibility.\
• measure of damages for pain and suffering and for loss of consortium is the enlightened conscience of fair and impartial jurors
• “It is the function of the jury to resolve conflict[s] in [the] testimony.”
• The jury’s verdict will stand if there is any evidence to support it.
• in reviewing the denial of a motion for new trial based on the sufficiency of the evidence, an appeals court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to upholding the jury’s verdict
• in reviewing the denial of a motion for new trial based on the sufficiency of the evidence, an appeals court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to upholding the jury’s verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).